Supernovae and supernova remnants



Supernovae


Generally accepted scheme distinguishes two main classes of supernovae (SNe): Ia resulting from the old stellar population (thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf, or a merger of two white dwarfs in a close binary system), and SNe of type II and Ib/c whose ancestors are young massive stars (died in a core-collapse explosion). Historically, classification of SNe, according to their optical spectra, began by recognizing SNe I, with no hydrogen lines, and SNe II which do show hydrogen in their spectra. In addition, SNe II were shown to exhibit much wider photometric behavior than SNe I, which seemed to be a rather homogeneous class of objects. Nevertheless, it was shown later that there are actually two spectroscopically and photometrically distinct subclasses of SNe I: Ia located only in ellipticals, and Ib found in HII regions and spiral arms, which strongly suggested that their progenitors were massive young stars with their hydrogen envelopes stripped. The third subclass, SNe Ic, discovered later, show no helium lines either, and thus correspond to massive stars stripped of their H and He envelopes.

Compact objects

Core-collapse supernovae, as their name suggests, are following the formation of compact stellar remnants: neutron stars and black holes.



Classification of supernovae.


Pair production
supernovae


Pair production supernovae
are presumed to be the final
stage of the evolution of very
massive stars, M > 100 solar
masses, in whose cores the
temperature is so high that
electron-positron pairs are
created from high energy γ-
ray photons. The explosion is
believed to disrupt the whole
star (no compact stellar
remnant) and is presumed to
occur primarily in Population
III stars.



SN Ia are known in astronomy as the "standard candles". Better understanding of some type II events (e.g. SNe II-P) and stripped-envelope SNe (Ib/c) could lead to their potential use as distance indicators as well. The problem of extinction is the most important issue to be dealt with in the process of obtaining true SN luminosities (absolute magnitudes). The plane-parallel model which gives absorption dependent on galaxy inclination (A ~ sec i), widely used in the past, was shown not to describe extinction adequately. There is some hope in an alternative model which introduces radial dependence of extinction, but further investigation is necessary.



Selected papers


B. Arbutina:
CONSTRAINTS ON THE MASSIVE SUPERNOVA PROGENITORS,
2007, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 10 (7), 1219
D. Onić, B. Arbutina, D. Urošević:
RADIAL DEPENDENCE OF EXTINCTION IN PARENT GALAXIES OF SUPERNOVAE,
2008, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrophys., 44, 103


Supernova remnants


While supernova events happen quite suddenly and last for a relatively short time, in astronomical
standards, supernova remnants (SNRs) - the material ejected in explosion continues
its life through the interaction with the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM)
for thousands, and in extreme cases even for a million years.
The standard picture of hydrodinamic evolution of supernova
remnants, from supernova to the end of expansion,
assumes four different phases:
1) free expansion,
2) adiabatic i.e. Sedov's phase,
3) isothermal or radiative phase, and
4) dissipation.
During the first phase ejected material
expands with constant velocity
v2 = (dR/dt)2 ~ Eo/Mo, where R and t
are radius of SNR and time since the
explosion, respectively, Eo is SN energy
and Mo is the mass of the ejecta.
The term 'free expansion' for the first phase of
evolution of SNRs is more historical, since there
may be significant declaration even in this phase.
When the shock wave sweeps-up enough ISM so that
its mass exceeds many times the mass of SN ejecta,
a SNR enters the second phase of evolution.

During this phase the shock wave decelerates according to the law v = dR/dt = 2R/(5t), i.e. R = 1.17 (Eoo)1/5t2/5, which is the well known Sedov's solution for a point-like explosion in uniform medium with density ρo. When the temperature behind the shock drops the energy loses due to radiation become significant and a remnant enters the radiative phase of evolution. It is expected in this epoch that SNR undergos a phase of dense shell formation. The remnant continues to expand as pressure-driven, (R ~ t2/7) or momentum-conserving snowplow (R ~ t1/4). Finally, when the expansion velocity becomes comparable with the sound speed in the surroundings, v2 ~ cs2 = γpoo, supernova remnant will merge with the interstellar medium and the evolution ends.

An interesting issue concerning SNRs is the question of their radio evolution or the so called Σ–D (surface brightness to diameter) relation which can be written in the form Σ = A D. Since parameters of the explosion (Eo, Mo) and the expansion (ρo) may substantially differ from remnant to remnant, it has been generally accepted that no single Σ–D relation can be constructed for all SNRs. However, it still might be possible to construct the relations for some classes of SNRs. This would be of great practical importance for estimation of distances to SNRs when no other methods are available.

Although they are known as relatively strong synchrotron radio sources, SNRs can also be observed in optical. In optical search for supernova remnants we use the fact that the optical spectra of SNRs have elevated [S II] : Hα emission-line ratios, as compared to the spectra of normal HII regions. This emission ratio has proven to be an accurate means of differentiating between shock-heated SNRs (ratios > 0.4, but often considerably higher) and photoionized nebulae (0.4, but typically < 0.2). The physical basis for this is as follows: in typical H II regions, sulfur exists mainly in the form of S++, yielding low [S II] λλ 6717,6731 to Hα emission ratios. After the shock wave from an SN explosion has propagated through the surrounding medium and the material has cooled sufficiently, a variety of ionization states are present, including S+. This accounts for the increased [S II] : Hα observed in SNRs.



Hα image of HII regions and a possible hypernova remnant in Holmberg IX in M81 galaxy group, obtained with 2m RCC telescope at NAO Rozhen, Bulgaria.


Selected papers


B. Arbutina, D. Urošević, M. Stanković, Lj. Tešić:
L-D DEPENDENCE FOR SUPERNOVA REMNANTS AND ITS CONNECTION WITH THE Σ - D RELATION,
2004, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 350, 346
D. Urošević, T.G. Pannuti, N. Duric, A. Theodorou:
THE Σ - D RELATION FOR SUPERNOVA REMNANTS IN NEARBY GALAXIES,
2005, Astron. Astrophys., 435, 437
B. Arbutina, D. Urošević:
Σ - D RELATION FOR SUPERNOVA REMNANTS AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE DENSITY OF THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM,
2005, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 360, 76
D. Urošević, T.G. Pannuti, D. Leahy:
AN ANALYSIS OF THE BROADBAND (22-3900 MHz) RADIO SPECTRUM OF HB 3 (G132.7+1.3): THE DETECTION OF THERMAL RADIO EMISSION FROM AN EVOLVED SUPERNOVA REMNANT?
2007, Astrophys. J., 655, L41
B. Arbutina, D. Ilić, K. Stavrev, D. Urošević, B. Vukotić, D. Onić:
OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF M81 GALAXY GROUP IN NARROW BAND [SII] AND Hα FILTERS: HOLMBERG IX,
2009, Serb. Astron. J., 179, 87
D. Urošević, B. Vukotić, B. Arbutina, M. Sarevska:
THE ORTHOGONAL FITTING PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF THE EMPIRICAL Σ - D RELATIONS FOR SUPERNOVA REMNANTS: APPLICATION TO STARBURST GALAXY M82
2010, Astrophys. J., 719, 950